Grossman v. Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grossman v. Grossman

132 A.D.2d 645, 517 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49192

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 20, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 132 A.D.2d 645 (Grossman v. Grossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grossman v. Grossman, 132 A.D.2d 645, 517 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49192 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Yachnin, J.), dated December 15, 1986, as, upon granting that branch of the plaintiff wife’s motion which was for upward modification of the awards of temporary maintenance and child support made in a prior order of the same court (De-Luca, J.), dated December 7, 1982, directed him to pay the sum of $500 per week as temporary maintenance and $250 per week for each of the parties’ two children as temporary child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances herein, the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, did not abuse its discretion in increasing the plaintiff wife’s temporary maintenance and child support in light of the court’s postponement of the trial of this action and the parties’ changed financial circumstances at the time the increase was requested by the plaintiff wife. We note that our affirmance should not influence any final determination as to the amounts of permanent maintenance and child support which may be made by the trial court. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Yachnin, J.), dated December 15, 1986, as, upon granting that branch of the plaintiff wife’s motion which was for upward modification of the awards of temporary maintenance and child support made in a prior order of the same court (De-Luca, J.), dated December 7, 1982, directed him to pay the sum of $500 per week as temporary maintenance and $250 per week for each of the parties’ two children as temporary child support.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances herein, the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, did not abuse its discretion in increasing the plaintiff wife’s temporary maintenance and child support in light of the court’s postponement of the trial of this action and the parties’ changed financial circumstances at the time the increase was requested by the plaintiff wife. We note that our affirmance should not influence any final determination as to the amounts of permanent maintenance and child support which may be made by the trial court. Lawrence, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 A.D.2d 645, 517 N.Y.S.2d 705, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-grossman-nyappdiv-1987.