Grossman v. Grossman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grossman v. Grossman

255 A.D. 953, 8 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5990

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 9, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 255 A.D. 953 (Grossman v. Grossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grossman v. Grossman, 255 A.D. 953, 8 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5990 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order appealed from in so far as it awards the custody of the child to the respondent unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. The order is further modified to the extent of referring the matter to an official referee to be named to take testimony and report to Special Term on the questions of defendant’s contempt of court and his present financial status. Pending the return of the report of the referee, defendant will continue to make payments as provided in the decree of divorce. Payments to be made to plaintiff’s committee. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order appealed from in so far as it awards the custody of the child to the respondent unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. The order is further modified to the extent of referring the matter to an official referee to be named to take testimony and report to Special Term on the questions of defendant’s contempt of court and his present financial status. Pending the return of the report of the referee, defendant will continue to make payments as provided in the decree of divorce. Payments to be made to plaintiff’s committee. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

255 A.D. 953, 8 N.Y.S.2d 665, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-grossman-nyappdiv-1938.