Grossman v. Fisher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grossman v. Fisher

173 A.D. 977, 158 N.Y.S. 1117

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1916·Published

Opinion

Judgment modified by striking therefrom the allowance of costs separately to the defendants Fisher, Rifkin, Eisler and Block, and by allowing to all of those defendants collectively one bill of costs of eighty-four dollars and forty-three cents; and as so modified judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs to either party, upon the ground that the said four defendants, having united in their answer and having been represented by a single attorney and counsel, should be allowed but a single bill of costs. Present— Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment modified by striking therefrom the allowance of costs separately to the defendants Fisher, Rifkin, Eisler and Block, and by allowing to all of those defendants collectively one bill of costs of eighty-four dollars and forty-three cents; and as so modified judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs to either party, upon the ground that the said four defendants, having united in their answer and having been represented by a single attorney and counsel, should be allowed but a single bill of costs. Present— Jenks, P. J., Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ.

Grossman v. Fisher, 173 A.D. 977, 158 N.Y.S. 1117 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

173 A.D. 977 (Grossman v. Fisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.