Grossman v. Consolidated Gas Co.

114 A.D. 242, 100 N.Y.S. 100, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2066

This text of 114 A.D. 242 (Grossman v. Consolidated Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grossman v. Consolidated Gas Co., 114 A.D. 242, 100 N.Y.S. 100, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2066 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

Opinions

Laughlin, J.:

The facts in this case present similar questions to those discussed in the opinion in Richman v. Consolidated Gas Co. (114 App. Div. 216), argued and decided herewith. In this case, however, with the same justice presiding, the motion for an injunction was granted, which is doubtless accounted for by the fact that the opinion of the learned Circuit judge of the United States construing the restraining order, theretofore granted in the suit instituted in the Federal court by the defendant, was filed in the meantime. (See Consolidated Gas Co. v. Mayer, 146 Fed. Rep. 150.)

It follows that the order should be affirmed upon the prevailing opinion in the Fiehman case, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. .

O’Brien, P. J., and Patterson, J., concurred; McLaughlin and Houghton, JJ., dissented.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richman v. Consolidated Gas Co.
114 A.D. 216 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 A.D. 242, 100 N.Y.S. 100, 1906 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-consolidated-gas-co-nyappdiv-1906.