Grossman v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. Florida·Decided April 17, 2025·No. 9:24-cv-80891·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

CASE NO. 24-80891-CIV-COHN/HUNT

MITCHELL GROSSMAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant. ________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation [DE 18] (“Report”) of Magistrate Judge Patrick M. Hunt regarding Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Justice Act [DE 17] (“Motion”). The Court has reviewed the Motion, Report, the record in this case, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. Plaintiff seeks attorney’s fees in the amount of $11,552.66, as well as reimbursement of the cost of filing in the amount of $405.00, to be paid pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (the “EAJA”). DE 17 at 1. The Court agrees with Judge Hunt that Plaintiff is entitled to a fee award under the EAJA and that the amount requested is reasonable. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation [DE 18] is hereby ADOPTED; 2. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees Under the Equal Justice Act [DE 17] is hereby GRANTED. Defendant shall pay attorney’s fees to Plaintiff pursuant to the EAJA in the amount of $11,552.66 and costs in the amount of $405.00. 3. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). If after receiving the Court's EAJA fee order, the Commissioner determines upon effectuation of the Court's EAJA fee order that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, the fees will be made payable to Plaintiff's attorney. However, if there is a debt owed that is subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program, any remaining EAJA fees after offset will be paid by a check payable to Plaintiff but delivered to Plaintiff's attorney. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Lauderdale, Broward County, Florida, this 17th day of April, 2025. □□□ la Uniged States District Judg Copies provided to counsel of record via CM/ECF

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grossman v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Fla. 2025).

Grossman v. Commissioner of Social Security (Grossman v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)