Grossman v. City of New York

2018 NY Slip Op 455
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 25, 2018
Docket5534 153579/13
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 455 (Grossman v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grossman v. City of New York, 2018 NY Slip Op 455 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Grossman v City of New York (2018 NY Slip Op 00455)
Grossman v City of New York
2018 NY Slip Op 00455
Decided on January 25, 2018
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 25, 2018
Acosta, P.J., Renwick, Kapnick, Kahn, Kern, JJ.

5534 153579/13

[*1]Bradley Grossman, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

The City of New York, et al., Defendants-Respondents.


Kelner & Kelner, New York (Gail S. Kelner of counsel), for appellant.

Zachary W. Carter, Corporation Counsel, New York (Anna Wolonciej of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), entered September 26, 2016, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The record demonstrates as a matter of law that defendants did not have constructive notice of the alleged water damage that caused the sudden collapse of the table on which plaintiff sat (see Gordon v American Museum of Natural History, 67 NY2d 836 [1986]; Soto v New Frontiers 2 Hope Hous. Dev. Fund Corp., Inc., 118 AD3d 471 [1st Dept 2014]; Lance v Den-Lyn Realty Corp., 84 AD3d 470 [1st Dept 2011]). Plaintiff's own testimony showed that the alleged water damage was neither visible nor apparent before

the table collapsed and therefore that a reasonable inspection would not have revealed that the table would be unable to support plaintiff's weight.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 25, 2018

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History
492 N.E.2d 774 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Lance v. Den-Lyn Realty Corp.
84 A.D.3d 470 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grossman-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2018.