Grosse v. Chelus, Herdzik, Speyer, Monte & Pajak, P.C.

11 A.D.3d 1043, 782 N.Y.S.2d 202
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 1, 2004
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.3d 1043 (Grosse v. Chelus, Herdzik, Speyer, Monte & Pajak, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grosse v. Chelus, Herdzik, Speyer, Monte & Pajak, P.C., 11 A.D.3d 1043, 782 N.Y.S.2d 202 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Joseph G. Makowski, J.), entered August 28, 2003. The judgment granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Present—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Gorski and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.3d 1043, 782 N.Y.S.2d 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grosse-v-chelus-herdzik-speyer-monte-pajak-pc-nyappdiv-2004.