Gross v. Wilds

94 S.E. 812, 21 Ga. App. 620, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 436
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 22, 1918·No. 8865·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

When a defendant against whom a verdict has been rendered makes a motion for a new trial, he can not properly, while the motion is still pending and undisposed of, bring to this court for review any ruling, order, or decision made by the judge during the progress of the case. Kelly & Jones Co. v. Moore, 125 Ga. 382 (54 S. E. 118); Duke v. Story, 113 Ga. 112 (38 S. E. 337); Carreker v. Thornton, 1 Ga. App. 508 (57 S. E. 988). It appearing from the bill of exceptions and the judge’s certificate attached thereto that the plaintiff in error is now seeking to review the ruling of the trial judge in striking the plea in abatement filed by the defendant, and that, upon the court’s subsequently directing a verdict for the plaintiff, a motion for new trial was made, and that at the time the bill of exceptions was certified the motion for a new trial was pending and undisposed of in the court below, the motion to dismiss the writ of error must be sustained.

Writ of error dismissed.

Wade, G. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gross v. Wilds, 94 S.E. 812, 21 Ga. App. 620, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 436 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

94 S.E. 812 (Gross v. Wilds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grahl v. Dorsey
193 S.E. 590 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Jones v. Naftel Dry Goods Co.
155 S.E. 510 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Kline v. Murray
257 P. 465 (Montana Supreme Court, 1927)
Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Cochran
138 S.E. 856 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)