Gross v. West New Brighton Bank

267 A.D. 964, 48 N.Y.S.2d 440, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5766
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 17, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Action, under section 807 of the Ciyil Practice Act, by a receiver in supplementary proceedings to recover from defendant bank the amount which it paid on the order of the judgment debtor out of his account with the bank. The payment was made in good faith, after the appointment of the receiver and the filing of his order of appointment with the clerk of the county, but at a time when the bank had no actual notice of the receivership. Order of the Appellate Term, affirming the order and judgment of the Municipal Court, which limits the plaintiff’s recovery to the amount on deposit at the time the bank received actual notice of the receivership, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel, Lewis and Aldrich, JJ. [181 Misc. 1.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gross v. West New Brighton Bank, 267 A.D. 964, 48 N.Y.S.2d 440, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5766 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

267 A.D. 964 (Gross v. West New Brighton Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Union Fire Insurance v. Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn
165 Misc. 2d 539 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)