Gross v. Townsend

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Gross v. Townsend

30 Misc. 797, 63 N.Y.S. 142

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 30 Misc. 797 (Gross v. Townsend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gross v. Townsend, 30 Misc. 797, 63 N.Y.S. 142 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This case turned upon a question as to the ■ delivery of one certificate. This question was fairly submitted to the jury through an impartial charge; and as there was a conflict of evidence upon it and no preponderance, as matter of law the verdict cannot be' disturbed. There was no error in the admission of evidence, and Mr. Townsend was sufficiently connected with the matter. The record excites a fear that the jury came to a wrong conclusion, but this will not suffice for a reversal.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This case turned upon a question as to the ■ delivery of one certificate. This question was fairly submitted to the jury through an impartial charge; and as there was a conflict of evidence upon it and no preponderance, as matter of law the verdict cannot be' disturbed. There was no error in the admission of evidence, and Mr. Townsend was sufficiently connected with the matter. The record excites a fear that the jury came to a wrong conclusion, but this will not suffice for a reversal.

Present: Truax, P. J.; Scott and Dugro, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 Misc. 797, 63 N.Y.S. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-townsend-nyappterm-1900.