Gross v. State

505 So. 2d 16, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 954, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12092
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 1987·No. No. 85-1423·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On a finding that the evidence presented against the defendant, in support of a conviction for two counts of first-degree murder, was overwhelming, see Williams v. State, 425 So.2d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and that the court did not err in giving a, flight instruction where the defendant left the jurisdiction shortly after the murders and was not apprehended until three years later in the state of New York, see Proffitt v. State, 315 So.2d 461 (Fla.1975), affd, 428 U.S. 242, 96 S.Ct. 2960, 49 L.Ed.2d 913 (1976), the convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gross v. State, 505 So. 2d 16, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 954, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12092 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

505 So. 2d 16 (Gross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fenelon v. State
594 So. 2d 292 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)