Gross v. State
This text of 863 So. 2d 167 (Gross v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We originally accepted jurisdiction of Gross v. State, 820 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), based upon express and direct conflict with Hankin v. State, 682 So.2d 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). However, we find that the Second District’s recent decision in Cairl v. State, 833 So.2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), resolved the conflict. Therefore, we discharge jurisdiction because the conflict of decisions was resolved.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
863 So. 2d 167, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 710, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1574, 2003 WL 22145384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-state-fla-2003.