Gross v. State
863 So. 2d 167, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 710, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1574, 2003 WL 22145384
Opinion
We originally accepted jurisdiction of Gross v. State, 820 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), based upon express and direct conflict with Hankin v. State, 682 So.2d 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). However, we find that the Second District’s recent decision in Cairl v. State, 833 So.2d 312 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), resolved the conflict. Therefore, we discharge jurisdiction because the conflict of decisions was resolved.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gross v. State, 863 So. 2d 167, 28 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 710, 2003 Fla. LEXIS 1574, 2003 WL 22145384 (Fla. 2003).
863 So. 2d 167 (Gross v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cairl v. State
833 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Hankin v. State
682 So. 2d 602 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Gross v. State
820 So. 2d 1043 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)