Gross v. Sipusic
9 N.E.2d 365, 101 Ind. App. 700, 1935 Ind. App. LEXIS 173
Opinion
Appellees having confessed reversible error, the judgment is reversed and the trial court is ordered to sustain appellants’ motion for new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gross v. Sipusic, 9 N.E.2d 365, 101 Ind. App. 700, 1935 Ind. App. LEXIS 173 (Ind. Ct. App. 1935).
9 N.E.2d 365 (Gross v. Sipusic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abbott v. Abbott
306 N.E.2d 382 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1974)
Kammins v. Buschmann
166 N.E.2d 654 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1960)