Gross v. Sipusic
9 N.E.2d 365, 101 Ind. App. 700, 1935 Ind. App. LEXIS 173
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 15, 1935
DocketNo. 15,512.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 9 N.E.2d 365 (Gross v. Sipusic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gross v. Sipusic, 9 N.E.2d 365, 101 Ind. App. 700, 1935 Ind. App. LEXIS 173 (Ind. Ct. App. 1935).
Opinion
Appellees having confessed reversible error, the judgment is reversed and the trial court is ordered to sustain appellants’ motion for new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Abbott v. Abbott
306 N.E.2d 382 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1974)
Kammins v. Buschmann
166 N.E.2d 654 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1960)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
9 N.E.2d 365, 101 Ind. App. 700, 1935 Ind. App. LEXIS 173, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-sipusic-indctapp-1935.