Gross v. Siegman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gross v. Siegman

248 A.D.2d 618, 669 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2869

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 23, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D.2d 618 (Gross v. Siegman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gross v. Siegman, 248 A.D.2d 618, 669 N.Y.S.2d 928, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a child visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the maternal grandmother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Feiden, J.), dated December 16, 1996, which terminated all visitation.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the Family Court’s determination that visitation would not be in the children’s best interests, and we decline to disturb that determination on appeal (see, Matter of Emanuel S. v Joseph E., 78 NY2d 178; Lo Presti v Lo Presti, 40 NY2d 522).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit.

Copertino, J. P., Altman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI