Home/Supreme Court of Rhode Island/Gross v. School Committee

Gross v. School Committee

314 A.2d 634, 112 R.I. 943, 1974 R.I. LEXIS 1555
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gross v. School Committee. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 R.I. 358 →
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided February 13, 1974·No. Appeal No. 73-222·Published

Opinion

Motion of plaintiffs to strike intervention of Hopkins ■ Transportation Co., Inc. is [944]*944denied without prejudice to right of plaintiffs,to renew, motion at hearing on merits. Motion of plaintiffs,to dismiss appeal of defendant School Committee of the Town of Glocester is denied without prejudice to right of plaintiffs to renew motion at hearing on merits. Motion of plaintiffs to’dismiss intervenor’s cross-appeal is denied’ without prejudice to right of plaintiffs to renew motion at' hearing on merits.

George' & George, William J. George, William Elias George, for'plaintiffs. Thomas F. Fogarty, Jr., Macktaz, Keefer and Kirby, Scott K. Keefer, for Intervenor, Hopkins Transportation Co., Inc., for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gross v. School Committee, 314 A.2d 634, 112 R.I. 943, 1974 R.I. LEXIS 1555 (R.I. 1974).

314 A.2d 634 (Gross v. School Committee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.