Gross v. Ruskin
133 So. 2d 759
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 1961·No. No. 61-95·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
The appellants each owned a leasehold interest in separate stores. They appeal from an order apportioning a condemnation award pursuant to Section 73.12, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The additional damages claimed were for relocation, depreciation and loss of business. Such damages are not recoverable by a lessee. See Romy v. Dade County, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 8; Orange State Oil Co. v. Jacksonville Express. Auth., Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 687.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gross v. Ruskin, 133 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).
133 So. 2d 759 (Gross v. Ruskin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Road Department v. Thibaut
190 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Pensacola Scrap Processors, Inc. v. State Road Dept.
188 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
State Road Department of Florida v. Bramlett
179 So. 2d 137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
State Road Department v. White
161 So. 2d 828 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
State Road Department v. White
148 So. 2d 32 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)