Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gross v. Ruskin

Gross v. Ruskin

133 So. 2d 759
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 1961
DocketNo. 61-95
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 133 So. 2d 759 (Gross v. Ruskin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gross v. Ruskin, 133 So. 2d 759 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants each owned a leasehold interest in separate stores. They appeal from an order apportioning a condemnation award pursuant to Section 73.12, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The additional damages claimed were for relocation, depreciation and loss of business. Such damages are not recoverable by a lessee. See Romy v. Dade County, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 8; Orange State Oil Co. v. Jacksonville Express. Auth., Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 687.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Road Department v. Thibaut
190 So. 2d 53 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Pensacola Scrap Processors, Inc. v. State Road Dept.
188 So. 2d 38 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
State Road Department of Florida v. Bramlett
179 So. 2d 137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
State Road Department v. White
161 So. 2d 828 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
State Road Department v. White
148 So. 2d 32 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 So. 2d 759, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-ruskin-fladistctapp-1961.