Gross v. PYROFAX GAS CORPORATION

259 S.E.2d 137, 151 Ga. App. 130, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2463
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 4, 1979
Docket57968
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 259 S.E.2d 137 (Gross v. PYROFAX GAS CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gross v. PYROFAX GAS CORPORATION, 259 S.E.2d 137, 151 Ga. App. 130, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2463 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

Banke, Judge.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a suit on account. The defendant did not file his affidavit opposing the motion for summary judgment until the date of the hearing; however, he served the affidavit on counsel for plaintiff by mail two days prior to the hearing. The affidavit apparently was not considered by the trial judge, as it does create a genuine issue of material fact. Held:

The party opposing a motion for summary judgment has until the day prior to the hearing to serve opposing affidavits, unless the trial court in its discretion permits them to be served at a later date. Code Ann. §§ 81A-106 (d) and 81A-156 (c). "Service by mail is complete upon mailing.” Code Ann. § 81A-105 (b). Accordingly, the defendant’s affidavit was timely served. Under this court’s decision in Liberty Forest Prod., Inc. v. Interstate Paper Corp., 138 Ga. App. 153 (225 SE2d 731) (1976), a response to a motion for summary judgment is timely filed if filed on the date of the hearing, notwithstanding the language in Code Ann. § 81 A-105 (d) requiring all papers after the complaint to be filed within the time allowed for service. Therefore, the defendant’s affidavit should have been considered, and the grant of summary judgment to the plaintiff was in error.

Judgment reversed.

McMurray,P. J., and Underwood, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Raw Deal, Inc.
659 S.E.2d 856 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2008)
Hayes v. Fernandez
335 S.E.2d 735 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Blair v. MOTORIZED LEASING, INC.
325 S.E.2d 896 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Suttle v. Northside Realty Associates, Inc.
321 S.E.2d 424 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Harper v. Birmingham Trust National Bank
320 S.E.2d 622 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Knight v. Bryant-Durham Electric Co.
313 S.E.2d 758 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1984)
Gilbert v. Decker
299 S.E.2d 65 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Bishop v. Stephens
296 S.E.2d 250 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Martin v. Newman
293 S.E.2d 18 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 S.E.2d 137, 151 Ga. App. 130, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-pyrofax-gas-corporation-gactapp-1979.