Gross v. Premier Amusements Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gross v. Premier Amusements Corp.

261 A.D. 1066, 27 N.Y.S.2d 783, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8764

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 10, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 261 A.D. 1066 (Gross v. Premier Amusements Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gross v. Premier Amusements Corp., 261 A.D. 1066, 27 N.Y.S.2d 783, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8764 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against the defendants and granting the cross-motion of defendant Jacob H. Levine for summary judgment against the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. In its opinion the court at Special Term erroneously stated that the complaint was dismissed as to all defendants. This was undoubtedly an inadvertence since only the defendant Jacob H. Levine had made a cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. As to whether there is a cause of action stated in the complaint against the corporation we do not decide, as that question is not now before us. Present — O’Malley, Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment against the defendants and granting the cross-motion of defendant Jacob H. Levine for summary judgment against the plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. In its opinion the court at Special Term erroneously stated that the complaint was dismissed as to all defendants. This was undoubtedly an inadvertence since only the defendant Jacob H. Levine had made a cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. As to whether there is a cause of action stated in the complaint against the corporation we do not decide, as that question is not now before us. Present — O’Malley, Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 A.D. 1066, 27 N.Y.S.2d 783, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8764, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-premier-amusements-corp-nyappdiv-1941.