Gross v. Higginbotham

130 S.E. 371, 34 Ga. App. 549, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 408
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1925·No. 16360·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

“The delivery of personal property into the exclusive possession of'.a child living separate from the parent shall create a presumption of a gift to the child. This presumption may be rebutted by evidence of an actual contract of lending, or from circumstances from which such a contract may be inferred.” Civil Code (1910), § 4150. In the instant trover suit the question of whether the transaction involved amounted to a gift of certain cattle by a parent to the defendant child was a question of fact for the jury (see Respass v. Young, 11 Ga. 114); and the jury, under the charge of the court, which is not excepted to, having found for the defendant, and there being sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, which is approved by the trial court, this court can not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., oonowr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gross v. Higginbotham, 130 S.E. 371, 34 Ga. App. 549, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 408 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

130 S.E. 371 (Gross v. Higginbotham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Respass v. Young
11 Ga. 114 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1852)