Gross v. Grossman

76 A.D.2d 1048, 907 N.Y.S.2d 876

This text of 76 A.D.2d 1048 (Gross v. Grossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gross v. Grossman, 76 A.D.2d 1048, 907 N.Y.S.2d 876 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Panepinto, J.), entered March 30, 2009, which denied his motion for pendente lite relief.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the Supreme Court correctly concluded that the parties’ “Marital Separation and Property Settlement Agreement” was properly acknowledged (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [3]; Weinstein v Weinstein, 36 AD 3d 797, 798 [2007]). Accordingly, the plaintiffs motion for pendente lite relief was properly denied (see Klein v Klein, 246 AD2d 195, 198 [1998]). Dillon, J.P., Florio, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weinstein v. Weinstein
36 A.D.3d 797 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Klein v. Klein
246 A.D.2d 195 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 A.D.2d 1048, 907 N.Y.S.2d 876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-grossman-nyappdiv-2010.