Gross v. Gross

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gross v. Gross

131 So. 2d 487, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2799

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 2, 1961·No. No. 2305·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has brought this appeal from an interlocutory order in an equity suit. Certain copies of the pleading's needed to determine the appeal are not contained in the appellant’s appendix. It is the duty of the appellant to make error clearly to appear. This court is not in a position to make a determination of the complained error because of the deficient record. See Johnson v. Roberts, Fla.1955, 79 So.2d 425; Broward County Port Authority v. F. M. Rule & Co., Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 82, and Rule 4.2, subd. d, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, C. J., KANNER, J., and MOODY, JAMES S., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has brought this appeal from an interlocutory order in an equity suit. Certain copies of the pleading's needed to determine the appeal are not contained in the appellant’s appendix. It is the duty of the appellant to make error clearly to appear. This court is not in a position to make a determination of the complained error because of the deficient record. See Johnson v. Roberts, Fla.1955, 79 So.2d 425; Broward County Port Authority v. F. M. Rule & Co., Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 82, and Rule 4.2, subd. d, Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

ALLEN, C. J., KANNER, J., and MOODY, JAMES S., Associate Judge, concur.

Gross v. Gross, 131 So. 2d 487, 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2799 (Fla. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

131 So. 2d 487 (Gross v. Gross) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related