Gross v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance

79 S.E. 138, 140 Ga. 531, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 174
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 14, 1913·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. Where it was stipulated in a policy of fire insurance 'that no suit should be maintainable thereon “unless commenced within twelve months next after the fire,” an action brought after the lapse of that period would be barred, although it purported on its face to be a renewal of a previous action which was instituted in a city court having jurisdiction thereof, within the time limited, which was dismissed and subsequently renewed in the superior court, after the payment of all costs, within six months from such dismissal, McDaniel v. German American Insurance Co., 134 Ga. 189 (67 S. E. 668), and citations.

•2. There was no error in dismissing the petition on demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concjir.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gross v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance, 79 S.E. 138, 140 Ga. 531, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 174 (Ga. 1913).

79 S.E. 138 (Gross v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SPRINGFIELD FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Carter
138 S.E.2d 590 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Kenemer v. Arkansas Fuel Oil Co.
151 F.2d 567 (Fifth Circuit, 1945)
Ellis v. Payne
274 F. 443 (N.D. Georgia, 1921)
Gallivitoch v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
106 S.E. 319 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)