Gross v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance
This text of 79 S.E. 138 (Gross v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Where it was stipulated in a policy of fire insurance 'that no suit should be maintainable thereon “unless commenced within twelve months next after the fire,” an action brought after the lapse of that period would be barred, although it purported on its face to be a renewal of a previous action which was instituted in a city court having jurisdiction thereof, within the time limited, which was dismissed and subsequently renewed in the superior court, after the payment of all costs, within six months from such dismissal, McDaniel v. German American Insurance Co., 134 Ga. 189 (67 S. E. 668), and citations.
•2. There was no error in dismissing the petition on demurrer.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 S.E. 138, 140 Ga. 531, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-globe-rutgers-fire-insurance-ga-1913.