Gross v. Gene Bennett Co.

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedOctober 6, 2009
DocketI.C. NO. 741638.
StatusPublished

This text of Gross v. Gene Bennett Co. (Gross v. Gene Bennett Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gross v. Gene Bennett Co., (N.C. Super. Ct. 2009).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Harris and the briefs and oral arguments before the Full Commission. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; or amend the Opinion and Award, except for minor modifications. Accordingly, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Harris with minor modifications.

* * * * * * * * * * *
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered by the parties as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The parties are subject to the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act. *Page 2

2. All parties are properly before the North Carolina Industrial Commission, and the Commission has jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter.

3. All parties have been correctly designated, and there are no questions as to misjoinder or nonjoinder of parties.

4. The date of the alleged injury that is the subject of this claim was March 5, 2007.

5. Plaintiff's job title was machinist/welder.

6. As of March 5, 2007, an employee/employer relationship existed between Plaintiff and Defendant-Employer.

7. As of March 5, 2007, Defendant-Employer was insured by American Home Assurance Company.

8. Defendants accepted this claim on a medicals-only basis.

***********
EXHIBITS
The following documents were accepted into evidence as stipulated exhibits:

Exhibit 1: Executed Pre-Trial Agreement

Exhibit 2: Plaintiff's Medical Records

Exhibit 3: Plaintiff's Discovery Responses

Exhibit 4: Industrial Commission Forms

Exhibit 5: Defendants' Discovery Responses

Exhibit 6: Correspondence regarding Plaintiff's REDA Claim

***********
The following were received into evidence by the Deputy Commissioner as:

DEPOSITIONS *Page 3
1. Oral deposition of Thomas Florian, M.D., taken on June 26, 2008;

2. Oral deposition of David R. Allen, Jr., M.D., taken on July 22, 2008.

***********
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record and reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff was 45 yeas old at the time of hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, with a date of birth of April 30, 1964. He went to school through the ninth grade and then later got his GED. He is a journeyman welder and his work history has been primarily in fabricating and machining steel and doing welding and electrical work.

2. Plaintiff began working for Defendant-Employer in February 2007. He had also worked for Defendant-Employer between 2002 and 2004.

3. During his time with Defendant-Employer in 2007 prior to his injury, Plaintiff had no physical limitations on his physical ability to do the work assigned. Plaintiff's job duties included reading blueprints; cutting, fitting, and welding steel; and installing the products in the field. Among other things, Plaintiff's job involved routinely lifting 50 pounds, going up ladders, and dragging lengths of heavy welding cords 100 to 200 feet long.

4. On the morning of March 5, 2007, Plaintiff was on a job for Defendant-Employer at a Sam's Club store. He was working in the ceiling when he fell through, falling 10 to 12 feet and hitting a machine before landing on the concrete floor.

5. Plaintiff went to the emergency room at Southeastern Regional Medical Center, where he complained of pain in his neck, low back, right shoulder, left forearm, right ankle, right *Page 4 knee, and chest. X-rays were negative for fractures. Plaintiff was diagnosed with multiple contusions.

6. Defendant-Employer directed Plaintiff to the practice of Dr. Florian, who specializes in physical medicine, rehabilitation, and pain management.

7. Plaintiff presented to Matthew Davis, PA-C on March 6, 2007. Plaintiff described the fall the day before and reported that he had a history of prior back injury in 1997. Upon examination of his low back, Plaintiff's range of motion was limited due to pain, and Mr. Davis noted positive Waddell's signs and positive bilateral straight leg raises. Mr. Davis diagnosed multiple contusions and restricted Plaintiff to no lifting; no repetitive bending; no pushing or pulling; no squatting, kneeling, or crawling; and no climbing.

8. Plaintiff saw Dr. Florian for the first time on March 20, 2007. Dr. Florian opined that Plaintiff had positive Waddell's signs, although, as he noted, Plaintiff did not perform the Waddell's testing maneuvers because of his stated level of pain. Plaintiff characterized his pain as being 10 out of 10. Dr. Florian assessed Plaintiff as having an exacerbation of pre-existing "back problems" and scheduled him for an MRI.

9. On April 17, 2007, Plaintiff underwent a lumbar MRI. The MRI revealed that Plaintiff had degenerative changes at L3-4 through L5-S1, with mild bilateral symmetrica neural formainal narrowing, but no disc herniation, spinal canal stenosis, or acute abnormality at any level.

10. Plaintiff followed up with Dr. Florian on May 1, 2007. Dr. Florian characterized Plaintiff as having "complaints of low back pain without any abnormal physiological findings." Dr. Florian noted Plaintiff's non-cooperation with the physical examination and physical *Page 5 therapy, and he concluded that Plaintiff was motivated by secondary gain. Dr. Florian released Plaintiff to return to work without restrictions.

11. Prior to being released to full duty by Dr. Florian, Plaintiff tried to do light duty work with Defendant-Employer in early March 2007, shortly after his accident. Plaintiff was paid for two days but was physically unable to do the duties assigned. Defendant-Employer's owner, Gene Bennett told Plaintiff to leave the premises and not to return until he could do full duty.

12. Shortly after his release by Dr. Florian, Defendant-Employer fired Plaintiff, and he has not worked or looked for work since May 1, 2007. As Mr. Bennett testified, Plaintiff did come back to work after Dr. Florian released him, whereupon Mr. Bennett and Plaintiff had a disagreement over Plaintiff's workers' compensation claim which resulted in Plaintiff's termination. As Mr. Bennett further testified, Plaintiff did not "refuse" to work at that point.

13. On June 11, 2007, Plaintiff went to the emergency room with low back pain radiating down his left leg.

14. Plaintiff presented to Dr. David R. Allen, Jr., a board-certified orthopedic surgeon, on August 30, 2007 with a number of complaints, but with his primary complaint being low back pain. Dr. Allen preformed injections to address Plaintiff's neck pain and low back pain, and he assigned restrictions of no standing for more than 15 minutes and no sitting for more than 15 minutes. He also referred Plaintiff for pain management.

15. Dr. Allen examined Plaintiff for the last time on March 25, 2008.

16.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Perez v. American Airlines/AMR Corp.
620 S.E.2d 288 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gross v. Gene Bennett Co., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-gene-bennett-co-ncworkcompcom-2009.