Gross v. Fontano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gross v. Fontano

206 A.D.2d 505, 615 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7623

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 25, 1994·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., arising from negligence, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated October 26, 1992, which denied his motion to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, by failing to object to the verdict as inconsistent before the jury was discharged, did not preserve that argument for appellate review (see, e.g., Barone v City of Mount Vernon, 170 AD2d 557). In any event, the verdict was not inconsistent (see, Barry v Manglass, 55 NY2d 803). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., arising from negligence, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), dated October 26, 1992, which denied his motion to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendants.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff, by failing to object to the verdict as inconsistent before the jury was discharged, did not preserve that argument for appellate review (see, e.g., Barone v City of Mount Vernon, 170 AD2d 557). In any event, the verdict was not inconsistent (see, Barry v Manglass, 55 NY2d 803). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Santucci and Altman, JJ., concur.

Gross v. Fontano, 206 A.D.2d 505, 615 N.Y.S.2d 279, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7623 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

206 A.D.2d 505 (Gross v. Fontano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related