Gross v. Estate of Fineman
600 So. 2d 41, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6859, 1992 WL 131872
Opinion
Contrary to the determination below, the record clearly establishes that the appellant is the lawful owner of the entire interest in the apartment in question. See Knapp v. Fredricksen, 148 Fla. 311, 4 So.2d 251 (1941). Accordingly, the judgment under review is reversed and the cause remanded [42] with directions to enter judgment in accordance herewith.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gross v. Estate of Fineman, 600 So. 2d 41, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6859, 1992 WL 131872 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).
600 So. 2d 41 (Gross v. Estate of Fineman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Knapp v. Fredricksen
4 So. 2d 251 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)