Gross v. District of Columbia
This text of Gross v. District of Columbia (Gross v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ROBERT DAMEON GROSS,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 13-52 (JEB) DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,
Defendant.
ORDER
Plaintiff filed the instant action in the District of Columbia Superior Court on November
29, 2012, and Defendant District of Columbia removed it here on January 11, 2013. See ECF
No. 1 (Notice of Removal). Eleven days later, the District moved for dismissal (including, for
some reason, on counts not in the Complaint). See ECF No. 3. Plaintiff has since sought three
extensions of time to file his Opposition, which the Court has granted, even though the third was
filed nine days after the deadline for a response. See ECF No. 9. In granting this third Motion,
the Court ordered that Plaintiff should respond to the District’s Motion by April 2. See Minute
Order of March 18, 2013. As he has failed to do so, the Court will treat the Motion as conceded
under LCvR 7(b).
The Court, accordingly, ORDERS that:
1. Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED; and
2. The case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
1 SO ORDERED.
/s/ James E. Boasberg JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge Date: April 8, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gross v. District of Columbia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-district-of-columbia-dcd-2013.