Gross v. Continental Caoutchouc-Export Aktiengesellschaft

262 A.D. 866, 28 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6312
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 16, 1941
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 262 A.D. 866 (Gross v. Continental Caoutchouc-Export Aktiengesellschaft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gross v. Continental Caoutchouc-Export Aktiengesellschaft, 262 A.D. 866, 28 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6312 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Action to recover commissions on the sale of merchandise and for breach of contract. From an order, directing partial summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, directing a severance, and denying the defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment in its favor, and from the judgment entered pursuant to such direction, the defendant appeals. Order modified on the law by striking out the first and second ordering paragraphs and inserting in lieu thereof the following: Ordered that the plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment be denied.” As so modified, the order is unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff vacated, without costs. The record discloses that there are issues of fact raised by the pleadings, exhibits and affidavits that require the issues to be tried. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [175 Misc. 496.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yonkers Metals Corp. v. I. Burack, Inc.
278 A.D. 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 866, 28 N.Y.S.2d 434, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-v-continental-caoutchouc-export-aktiengesellschaft-nyappdiv-1941.