Gross, N. v. Mintz, J. Pet of: McMichael, V.
This text of Gross, N. v. Mintz, J. Pet of: McMichael, V. (Gross, N. v. Mintz, J. Pet of: McMichael, V.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
NICOLE EVA GROSS : No. 104 MM 2022 : : v. : : : JARED ZALMAN MINTZ : : : PETITION OF: VIRGINIA HINRICHS : MCMICHAEL, ESQUIRE :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 20th day of December, 2022, the “Application for Leave to
Withdraw Appearance” is DISMISSED, as counsel’s name is not set forth in or endorsed
upon the Petition for Allowance of Appeal. Cf. Pa.R.A.P. 1112(f) (providing that an
attorney’s name “set forth in or endorsed upon the petition for allowance of appeal”
effectuates the attorney’s entry of appearance in this Court and generally requiring the
attorney to seek this Court’s leave if she or he later wishes to withdraw).
The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to process Nicole Eva Gross’ pro se Petition for
Allowance of Appeal in the normal course, including issuing any defect-correction notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gross, N. v. Mintz, J. Pet of: McMichael, V., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gross-n-v-mintz-j-pet-of-mcmichael-v-pa-2022.