Grosjean v. Crescent Cigar Tobacco Company
This text of 185 So. 716 (Grosjean v. Crescent Cigar Tobacco Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The issues tendered here, except as to the amount, are identical with those involved in the matter of Alice Lee Gros-jean, Collector of Revenue of the State of Louisiana v. Valloft & Dreux, Inc., 185 So. 711, decided by us this day. In this case there is no contention that there was a fire loss, though, with this single exception, every contention made there is presented here.
For the reasons therein given, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from he and it is affirmed at the cost of appellant.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
185 So. 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grosjean-v-crescent-cigar-tobacco-company-lactapp-1939.