Grosjean v. Crescent Cigar Tobacco Company

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Grosjean v. Crescent Cigar Tobacco Company

185 So. 716

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided January 23, 1939·No. No. 17142.·Published

Opinion

JANVIER, Judge.

The issues tendered here, except as to the amount, are identical with those involved in the matter of Alice Lee Gros-jean, Collector of Revenue of the State of Louisiana v. Valloft & Dreux, Inc., 185 So. 711, decided by us this day. In this case there is no contention that there was a fire loss, though, with this single exception, every contention made there is presented here.

For the reasons therein given, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from he and it is affirmed at the cost of appellant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JANVIER, Judge.

The issues tendered here, except as to the amount, are identical with those involved in the matter of Alice Lee Gros-jean, Collector of Revenue of the State of Louisiana v. Valloft & Dreux, Inc., 185 So. 711, decided by us this day. In this case there is no contention that there was a fire loss, though, with this single exception, every contention made there is presented here.

For the reasons therein given, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from he and it is affirmed at the cost of appellant.

Affirmed.

Grosjean v. Crescent Cigar Tobacco Company, 185 So. 716 (La. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

185 So. 716 (Grosjean v. Crescent Cigar Tobacco Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related