Grosjean v. Crescent Cigar & Tobacco Co.

186 So. 365
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedFebruary 6, 1939
DocketNo. 17142.
StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 365 (Grosjean v. Crescent Cigar & Tobacco Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grosjean v. Crescent Cigar & Tobacco Co., 186 So. 365 (La. Ct. App. 1939).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rehearing refused. See Per Curiam rendered this day in the'case of Alice Lee Grosjean, Collector of Revenue of the State of Louisiana v. Valloft & Dreupc, Inc., La.App., 186 So. 364.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grosjean v. Valloft & Dreux, Inc.
186 So. 364 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 So. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grosjean-v-crescent-cigar-tobacco-co-lactapp-1939.