Grosheim v. Mineola Boulevard Realty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grosheim v. Mineola Boulevard Realty Co.

252 A.D. 869, 299 N.Y.S. 953, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6625

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 869 (Grosheim v. Mineola Boulevard Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grosheim v. Mineola Boulevard Realty Co., 252 A.D. 869, 299 N.Y.S. 953, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6625 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of falling downstairs in a building of the defendant by reason of water [870]*870and soap powder on the steps. Judgment as corrected and order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Shearod v. Forty-first & Park Avenue Corporation, 254 N. Y. 618; Wakeman v. New York, N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 272 id. 625; O’Leary v. Standard Oil Co., 265 id. 627.) The error in respect of claimed admissions made by the janitor concerned alleged statements which were helpful rather than hurtful to the defendant, and, therefore, involved no prejudicial error. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of falling downstairs in a building of the defendant by reason of water [870]*870and soap powder on the steps. Judgment as corrected and order denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Shearod v. Forty-first & Park Avenue Corporation, 254 N. Y. 618; Wakeman v. New York, N. H. & H. R. R. Co., 272 id. 625; O’Leary v. Standard Oil Co., 265 id. 627.) The error in respect of claimed admissions made by the janitor concerned alleged statements which were helpful rather than hurtful to the defendant, and, therefore, involved no prejudicial error. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 869, 299 N.Y.S. 953, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6625, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grosheim-v-mineola-boulevard-realty-co-nyappdiv-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack