Grose v. McMullen
2 Del. Ch. 227
Opinion
considered that the bond, although not yet due, was assets for the payment of the testator’s debts; and that it was not exempted by the mere charge of the debts on real estate; that the will must show an intent, express or implied, to exonerate the personal estate, and that in this will, such intent is not sufficiently demonstrable. A decree was entered to marshal the assets, and ordering a sale of the Townsend bond for that purpose.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grose v. McMullen, 2 Del. Ch. 227 (Del. Ct. App. 1859).
2 Del. Ch. 227 (Grose v. McMullen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cooch's Exr. v. Cooch's Admr.
10 Del. 540 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1879)