Grosch v. Kessler

231 A.D. 870
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 231 A.D. 870 (Grosch v. Kessler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grosch v. Kessler, 231 A.D. 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for appellant, with costs. We are of opinion that the original source of defendant’s title- was a forged instrument and was not entitled to record (Marden v. Dorthy, 160 N. Y. 39), and that in such a case estoppel does not apply. We are further of opinion that the question of forgery overcame the presumption of due execution which arises from the recorded instrument itself. Findings of fact and conclusions cf law inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings and conclusions will 'be made. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montague v. Yezol, Inc.
2024 NY Slip Op 24067 (New York Supreme Court, Bronx County, 2024)
Dorothy M. Faison v. Tonya Lewis
32 N.E.3d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
231 A.D. 870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grosch-v-kessler-nyappdiv-1930.