Groq, Inc. v. Groq Health, Inc.

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GROQ, INC., 5/18/26 Plaintiff, -against- 1:23-cv-8325-MKV ORDER OF DISMISSAL GROQ HEALTH, INC., and FLORENCE D. COMITE, M.D., Defendants. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter from the parties stating that they have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 166]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and the application to restore the action is made by June 18, 2026. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc., 356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). All other dates and deadlines, including the upcoming trial and deadlines for pretrial submissions, are adjourned sine die. SO ORDERED. _________________________________ Date: May 18, 2026 MARY KAY VYSKOCIL New York, NY United States District Judge