Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company
98 N.E. 1103, 205 N.Y. 617, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1380
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that the amendment of the complaint allowed by the trial court introduced a new and different cause of action, as to which this court concurs in the dissenting opinion of Ingraham, P. J., below; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, 98 N.E. 1103, 205 N.Y. 617, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1380 (N.Y. 1912).
98 N.E. 1103 (Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seward Park Housing Corp. v. Cohen
287 A.D.2d 157 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Gropp v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
157 A.D. 346 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)