Home/New York Court of Appeals/Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company

Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company

98 N.E. 1103, 205 N.Y. 617, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1380
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 4, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 98 N.E. 1103 (Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gropp v. . the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, 98 N.E. 1103, 205 N.Y. 617, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1380 (N.Y. 1912).

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide event, on the ground that the amendment of the complaint allowed by the trial court introduced a new and different cause of action, as to which this court concurs in the dissenting opinion of Ingraham, P. J., below; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock, Chase and Collin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seward Park Housing Corp. v. Cohen
287 A.D.2d 157 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Gropp v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
157 A.D. 346 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 N.E. 1103, 205 N.Y. 617, 1912 N.Y. LEXIS 1380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gropp-v-the-great-atlantic-and-pacific-tea-company-ny-1912.