Groover v. State

579 So. 2d 343, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4597, 1991 WL 75634
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Groover v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 632 So. 2d 691
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 1991·No. No. 89-2824·Published

Opinion

WIGGINTON, Judge.

Appellant appeals his conviction, after jury trial, of attempted escape and also challenges his 15-year sentence. We affirm his conviction but vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing since a score-sheet was not prepared in this case for consideration by the trial judge. As recognized in Holton v. State, 573 So.2d 284 (Fla.1991), Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(1) provides that a scoresheet shall be prepared and that any sentence must be imposed based on the scoresheet that has been reviewed by the trial judge. See also Brooks v. State, 505 So.2d 639 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Therefore, we vacate appellant’s sentence and remand for resen-tencing after preparation of a scoresheet which is considered by the trial judge.

ERVIN, J., and WENTWORTH, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Groover v. State, 579 So. 2d 343, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 4597, 1991 WL 75634 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

579 So. 2d 343 (Groover v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holton v. State
573 So. 2d 284 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Brooks v. State
505 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)