Groover v. Heald

166 S.E. 770, 175 Ga. 912, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 364
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 21, 1932·No. No. 9104·Published

Opinion

Hill, J.

Construing together the petition and the amendment, a purpose to execute a deed in order to defeat creditors was shown; and the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and in dismissing the action. See Tune v. Beeland, 131 Ga. 528 (62 S. E. 976); Anderson v. Anderson, 150 Ga. 142, 146 (103 S. E. 160).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur. J. E. Oraigmiles, for plaintiff. P. G. Andrews, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Groover v. Heald, 166 S.E. 770, 175 Ga. 912, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 364 (Ga. 1932).

166 S.E. 770 (Groover v. Heald) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tune v. Beeland
62 S.E. 976 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1908)
Anderson v. Anderson
103 S.E. 160 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1920)