Groover v. Heald

Supreme Court of Georgia

Groover v. Heald

166 S.E. 770, 175 Ga. 912, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 364

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedNovember 21, 1932

DocketNo. 9104

StatusPublished

This text of 166 S.E. 770 (Groover v. Heald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Groover v. Heald, 166 S.E. 770, 175 Ga. 912, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 364 (Ga. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

Construing together the petition and the amendment, a purpose to execute a deed in order to defeat creditors was shown; and the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and in dismissing the action. See Tune v. Beeland, 131 Ga. 528 (62 S. E. 976); Anderson v. Anderson, 150 Ga. 142, 146 (103 S. E. 160).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur. J. E. Oraigmiles, for plaintiff. P. G. Andrews, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

Construing together the petition and the amendment, a purpose to execute a deed in order to defeat creditors was shown; and the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and in dismissing the action. See Tune v. Beeland, 131 Ga. 528 (62 S. E. 976); Anderson v. Anderson, 150 Ga. 142, 146 (103 S. E. 160).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices eoneur. J. E. Oraigmiles, for plaintiff. P. G. Andrews, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 S.E. 770, 175 Ga. 912, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/groover-v-heald-ga-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack