Grooms v. Moore
766 So. 2d 459, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11208, 2000 WL 1232847
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 1, 2000·No. No. 1D00-1612·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We dismiss this appeal because the notice of appeal was untimely. The appellant’s untimely motion for rehearing did not toll the time for an appeal. See Toliver v. State, 737 So.2d 627 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grooms v. Moore, 766 So. 2d 459, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11208, 2000 WL 1232847 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
766 So. 2d 459 (Grooms v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Petit-Homme v. State
857 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)