Grooms v. Moore

766 So. 2d 459, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11208, 2000 WL 1232847
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 1, 2000
DocketNo. 1D00-1612
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 766 So. 2d 459 (Grooms v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grooms v. Moore, 766 So. 2d 459, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11208, 2000 WL 1232847 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We dismiss this appeal because the notice of appeal was untimely. The appellant’s untimely motion for rehearing did not toll the time for an appeal. See Toliver v. State, 737 So.2d 627 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h).

WOLF, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Petit-Homme v. State
857 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
766 So. 2d 459, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11208, 2000 WL 1232847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grooms-v-moore-fladistctapp-2000.