Groo v. Whitney

42 App. D.C. 381, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2292
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 7, 1914
DocketNo. 2703
StatusPublished

This text of 42 App. D.C. 381 (Groo v. Whitney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Groo v. Whitney, 42 App. D.C. 381, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2292 (D.C. 1914).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the supreme court of the District of Columbia, and on a motion to dismiss, which was argued by counsel.

On consideration whereof, It is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decree of the said supreme court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Whitney v. Groo, 40 App. D. C. 496.

A petition for the writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court of the United States, December 1, 1914. [235 U. S. 103, 59 L. ed. —, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 208.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sage v. Hampe
235 U.S. 99 (Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
42 App. D.C. 381, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/groo-v-whitney-dc-1914.