Groo v. Whitney

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Groo v. Whitney

42 App. D.C. 381, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2292

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided October 7, 1914·No. No. 2703·Published

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the supreme court of the District of Columbia, and on a motion to dismiss, which was argued by counsel.

On consideration whereof, It is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decree of the said supreme court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Whitney v. Groo, 40 App. D. C. 496.

A petition for the writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court of the United States, December 1, 1914. [235 U. S. 103, 59 L. ed. —, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 208.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of the record from the supreme court of the District of Columbia, and on a motion to dismiss, which was argued by counsel.

On consideration whereof, It is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that the decree of the said supreme court in this cause be, and the same is hereby, affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Whitney v. Groo, 40 App. D. C. 496.

A petition for the writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court of the United States, December 1, 1914. [235 U. S. 103, 59 L. ed. —, 35 Sup. Ct. Rep. 208.]

Groo v. Whitney, 42 App. D.C. 381, 1914 U.S. App. LEXIS 2292 (D.C. 1914).

Pincite

42 App. D.C. 381 (Groo v. Whitney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related