Groner v. United States

Supreme Court

Groner v. United States

414 U.S. 969, 94 S. Ct. 278, 38 L. Ed. 2d 213, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1086

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 23, 1973

DocketNo. 72-1731

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 414 U.S. 969 (Groner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Groner v. United States, 414 U.S. 969, 94 S. Ct. 278, 38 L. Ed. 2d 213, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1086 (1973).

Pincite

Opinions

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836 (1973). Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that federal obscenity regulation is prohibited by the First Amendment (see United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123, 130 (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari in this case and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836 (1973). Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that federal obscenity regulation is prohibited by the First Amendment (see United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123, 130 (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari in this case and reverse the judgment of conviction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

414 U.S. 969, 94 S. Ct. 278, 38 L. Ed. 2d 213, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/groner-v-united-states-scotus-1973.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack