Grommes v. Shute

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Grommes v. Shute

48 N.W. 784, 46 Minn. 182, 1891 Minn. LEXIS 272

DecidedMay 12, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 48 N.W. 784 (Grommes v. Shute) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grommes v. Shute, 48 N.W. 784, 46 Minn. 182, 1891 Minn. LEXIS 272 (Mich. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Mitchell, J.

Under the rule laid down in Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398, (434,) which has been always, inflexibly adhered to and applied by this court, there is no ground for interfering with the action of the trial court in granting a new trial in this case. An examination of the record not only fails to satisfy us that the preponderance of the evidence was manifestly and palpably in favor of the verdict, but, on the contrary, convinces us that the discretion of the trial court was wisely exercised.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mitchell, J.

Under the rule laid down in Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398, (434,) which has been always, inflexibly adhered to and applied by this court, there is no ground for interfering with the action of the trial court in granting a new trial in this case. An examination of the record not only fails to satisfy us that the preponderance of the evidence was manifestly and palpably in favor of the verdict, but, on the contrary, convinces us that the discretion of the trial court was wisely exercised.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 N.W. 784, 46 Minn. 182, 1891 Minn. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grommes-v-shute-minn-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack