Gromak v. State
This text of 497 So. 2d 896 (Gromak v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant raises a number of points on appeal, only one of which we reach because it clearly warrants a reversal. The facts of this case are closely akin to those found in the Eleventh Circuit case of U.S. v. Thompson, 712 F.2d 1356 (11th Cir.1983), where [897]*897an initial Terry1 stop of the defendant was held invalid. We find the ruling in Thompson persuasive and hold that the initial stop of appellant in the present case was also invalid. Thus, the subsequent searches and seizures were without a proper basis. As it was stipulated that these were dispos-itive, the convictions on both counts are reversed and appellant is ordered to be discharged.
REVERSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
497 So. 2d 896, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2140, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 10040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gromak-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.