Grolock v. Haefenfeldtz
122 A. 925, 99 Conn. 732, 1923 Conn. LEXIS 150
This text of 122 A. 925 (Grolock v. Haefenfeldtz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Grolock v. Haefenfeldtz, 122 A. 925, 99 Conn. 732, 1923 Conn. LEXIS 150 (Colo. 1923).
Opinion
The errors assigned are all predicated upon corrections of the finding. We have duly considered the evidence and cannot hold that the court found facts’ or failed to find facts, essential to the judgment, incorrectly. The conclusions of the trial court could have been reasonably reached upon the evidence and the inferences drawn from it.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
122 A. 925, 99 Conn. 732, 1923 Conn. LEXIS 150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grolock-v-haefenfeldtz-conn-1923.