Grollemund v. Adler
This text of 6 N.J. Misc. 115 (Grollemund v. Adler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The case was tried in the Hudson Circuit, and a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff for $3,000.
The action was instituted to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate as the result of being struck by defendant’s automobile. The rule brings up only the question of the inadequacy of the damages.
The decedent was fifty-five years of age and in robust health; he earned $60 a week as a fancy cake baker, and gave his wife $50 a week, which sum included expenditures for his board and clothes; he left surviving him his wife, sixty years old, and four sons, aged, respectively, eighteen, twenty-two, twenty-four and twenty-seven. Two of the sons are married. The actuary gave his expectancy of life as seventeen and six-tenths years.
We think under the testimony and the circumstances arising therefrom that the rule should be made absolute as to damages only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 N.J. Misc. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grollemund-v-adler-nj-1928.