Groggins v. Robbins

675 F. App'x 322
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 2017
DocketNo. 16-2047
StatusPublished

This text of 675 F. App'x 322 (Groggins v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Groggins v. Robbins, 675 F. App'x 322 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Philip Groggins appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying him a discharge in his bankruptcy case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Groggins v. Robbins, No. 7:15-cv-00690-NKM, 2016 WL 4536890 (W.D. Va. Aug. 30, 2016). We deny Groggins’ motion for a transcript at government expense, deny his motion for reversal on appeal, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Discharge
11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 F. App'x 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/groggins-v-robbins-ca4-2017.