Groggins v. Robbins
This text of 675 F. App'x 322 (Groggins v. Robbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Philip Groggins appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying him a discharge in his bankruptcy case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Groggins v. Robbins, No. 7:15-cv-00690-NKM, 2016 WL 4536890 (W.D. Va. Aug. 30, 2016). We deny Groggins’ motion for a transcript at government expense, deny his motion for reversal on appeal, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
675 F. App'x 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/groggins-v-robbins-ca4-2017.