Groggins v. Robbins

Fourth Circuit

Groggins v. Robbins

675 F. App'x 322

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2017·No. No. 16-2047·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Philip Groggins appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying him a discharge in his bankruptcy case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Groggins v. Robbins, No. 7:15-cv-00690-NKM, 2016 WL 4536890 (W.D. Va. Aug. 30, 2016). We deny Groggins’ motion for a transcript at government expense, deny his motion for reversal on appeal, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Philip Groggins appeals from the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying him a discharge in his bankruptcy case pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(2)(A) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Groggins v. Robbins, No. 7:15-cv-00690-NKM, 2016 WL 4536890 (W.D. Va. Aug. 30, 2016). We deny Groggins’ motion for a transcript at government expense, deny his motion for reversal on appeal, and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Groggins v. Robbins, 675 F. App'x 322 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

675 F. App'x 322 (Groggins v. Robbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related