Grofsick v. Babbitt
This text of 8 A.D.2d 829 (Grofsick v. Babbitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for conspiracy and fraud, and to impress a trust upon real property, the appeal is from so much of an order as conditions the granting of appellants’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint for lack of prosecution (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 156) upon respondent’s failure to notice the action for trial for a stated term. Order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 A.D.2d 829, 190 N.Y.S.2d 627, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grofsick-v-babbitt-nyappdiv-1959.