Groff v. Pete Kingsley Builder, Inc.

567 A.2d 1041, 523 Pa. 421, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 18
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 5, 1990
DocketAppeal No. 37 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1989
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 567 A.2d 1041 (Groff v. Pete Kingsley Builder, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Groff v. Pete Kingsley Builder, Inc., 567 A.2d 1041, 523 Pa. 421, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 18 (Pa. 1990).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY and ZAPPALA, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. Northridge Development Associates
622 A.2d 381 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)
Krugh v. Laurich
17 Pa. D. & C.4th 666 (Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
567 A.2d 1041, 523 Pa. 421, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/groff-v-pete-kingsley-builder-inc-pa-1990.