Groff v. Pete Kingsley Builder, Inc.

567 A.2d 1041, 523 Pa. 421, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 18
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 5, 1990·No. Appeal No. 37 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1989·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Appeal dismissed as having been improvidently granted.

NIX, C.J., and FLAHERTY and ZAPPALA, JJ., dissent and would reverse the Order of the Superior Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Groff v. Pete Kingsley Builder, Inc., 567 A.2d 1041, 523 Pa. 421, 1990 Pa. LEXIS 18 (Pa. 1990).

567 A.2d 1041 (Groff v. Pete Kingsley Builder, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Northridge Development Associates
622 A.2d 381 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)
Krugh v. Laurich
17 Pa. D. & C.4th 666 (Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, 1991)