Groff v. Daily Review Corp.

248 A.D. 773
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1936·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order denying, in an action for libel, plaintiff’s motion for an examination of the defendant with respect to matters alleged in the complaint and denied by the defendant, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs. The nature of the [774]*774action does not justify denial of the motion. The subject-matter of the examination is proper in view of defendant’s denials. The introduction of each item with the word “ Whether ” is not objectionable. Although some of the items are not in good form, this court will not correct the form or substance of questions that were not made the subject of objection. The examination is to proceed on five days’ notice at a time and place to be fixed in the order. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Groff v. Daily Review Corp., 248 A.D. 773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

248 A.D. 773 (Groff v. Daily Review Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dieterle v. Universal Publishing & Distributing Corp.
38 Misc. 2d 973 (New York Supreme Court, 1963)
Milner v. Long Island Daily Press Publishing Co.
10 A.D.2d 519 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)