Groff Et Ux. v. Bank of West Tampa

Supreme Court of Florida

Groff Et Ux. v. Bank of West Tampa

140 So. 194, 104 Fla. 439

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 11, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

—This canse having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the decree appealed from. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell and Davis, J.J., and Koonce, Circuit Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

—This canse having been heretofore submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the final decree herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the decree appealed from. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Terrell and Davis, J.J., and Koonce, Circuit Judge, concur.

Groff Et Ux. v. Bank of West Tampa, 140 So. 194, 104 Fla. 439 (Fla. 1932).

Pincite

140 So. 194 (Groff Et Ux. v. Bank of West Tampa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.