Groenings v. Groenings

Missouri Court of Appeals

Groenings v. Groenings

327 S.W.3d 630, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1744, 2010 WL 5174542

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 21, 2010·No. ED 94295·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sarah Groenings appeals from the Order and Judgment entered on December 9, 2009 that resolved issues following a remand from this Court on December 2, 2008 relating to the division of property awarded in the original judgment of dissolution entered on July 11, 2007 dissolving her marriage to William Groenings. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Sarah Groenings appeals from the Order and Judgment entered on December 9, 2009 that resolved issues following a remand from this Court on December 2, 2008 relating to the division of property awarded in the original judgment of dissolution entered on July 11, 2007 dissolving her marriage to William Groenings. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Groenings v. Groenings, 327 S.W.3d 630, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1744, 2010 WL 5174542 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

327 S.W.3d 630 (Groenings v. Groenings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related